编号 lyqk011776

中文标题 高密度城区铁路廊道绿地生态系统文化服务供给潜力与机会——以京秦铁路为例

作者 蒙小英  游悦  边紫琳  陈远方 

作者单位 北京交通大学建筑与艺术学院 北京 100044

期刊名称 中国城市林业 

年份 2024 

卷号 22

期号 6

栏目名称 专题: 城市绿地生物多样性与生态系统服务 

中文摘要 为探究高密度城区铁路沿线绿地是否具有提供生态系统文化服务(CES)的可能性,文章以北京市中心城区段的京秦铁路为研究对象,以供给潜力、供给机会两大类八小类( 绿地面积、空间类型、与绿地外水体的距离、铁路遗产遗存、可达性、自然景观、文化景观、商业设施)测度京秦铁路沿线绿地CES供给可能性;利用泰森多边形将各类不同数据空间化并叠合,从空间上辨析供给可能性大小区域。结果表明:1)总供给潜力与机会大的地块在铁路线南北两侧分布较均匀,总供给潜力与机会小的区域在铁路线南侧分布较多。2)铁路绿廊的供给潜力北侧优于南侧,但供给机会南侧优于北侧。3)北京站至东三环总供给潜力与机会最大,向东有逐渐减小趋势,其中双桥站附近总供给潜力与机会小的地块较多。4)以人口分布密度为需求因子,研究区存在6个低供高需地块;对现状设施、绿化覆盖类型等进行评价,精准落位9个供给较弱的地块。综上可知,建成区越成熟,基础设施越完善、空间类型越丰富,铁路沿线绿地提供CES的潜力与机会越大,但并未显示绿地规模与CES供给潜力与机会之间的关联性。

关键词 铁路廊道绿地  生态系统文化服务  供给潜力  供给机会 

基金项目 国家自然科学基金资助52078026)

英文标题 Opportunities and Potentials in Cultural Ecosystem Services Supply of Green Spaces Along Railway Corridors in High Density Urban Area: A Case Study of Beijing-Qinhuangdao Railway

作者英文名 Meng Xiaoying, You Yue, Bian Zilin, Chen Yuanfang

单位英文名 School of Architecture and Design, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China

英文摘要 To explore whether railway corridor green spaces in high-density urban area have the potential to provide cultural ecosystem services (CES), the paper takes Beijing-Qinhuangdao Railway in the central area of Beijing as the research object to measure the possibility of CES supply on 8 items from the two categories of supply potential and supply opportunity, including green space area, spatial type, distance from water bodies outside the green space, railway heritage, accessibility, natural landscape, cultural landscape, and commercial facilities. Voronoi diagram is used to visualize and overlap different types of data, in order to clarify the sizes of supply possibility from a spatial perspective. The results indicate: 1) The plots with high total supply potential and opportunity are evenly distributed on the north and south sides of the railway line, and those with small total supply potentials and opportunities are more distributed on the south side; 2) The supply potentials of railway corridor green spaces are higher on the north side than on the south side; 3) The total supply potentials and opportunities are the largest from Beijing Station to the East Third Ring Road, gradually decreasing towards the east. Among them, there are more plots with small total supply potentials and opportunities near Shuangqiao Station; and 4) With population distribution density as the demand factor, there are 6 plots characterized with low supply and high demand in the study area. The evaluation of current facilities and green coverage types identifies accurately 9 plots with weak supply. It is summarized that the more mature the built area, the more improved the infrastructures, the more diverse the spatial types and the greater the potential and opportunity the green spaces along the railway provide CES. However, the correlation between the green space sizes and the CES supply potential and opportunity is not indicated.

英文关键词 railway corridor green space;cultural ecosystem service;supply potential, supply opportunity

起始页码 44

截止页码 54,84

投稿时间 2024/3/21

作者简介 蒙小英(1972-),女,博士,教授,研究方向为城市公共空间设计、交通景观。E-mail:xymeng@bjtu.edu.cn

DOI 10.12169/zgcsly.2024.03.21.0002

参考文献 [1] NOWAK-OLEJNIK A,SCHIRPKE U,TAPPEINER U.A systematic review on subjective well-being benefits associated with cultural ecosystem services[J]. Ecosystem Services,2022,57:101467.
[2] JOHANSSON M,PEDERSEN E,WEISNER S.Assessing cultural ecosystem services as individuals' place-based appraisals[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2019,39:79-88.
[3] 黄思源,唐雨函,周媛,等.基于游客感知视角的武汉市东湖绿道生态系统文化服务评价[J]. 中国城市林业,2022,20(3):88-93.
[4] 李凯,沈雯,黄宗胜.城市绿色空间生态系统文化服务绩效评价:以贵阳市黔灵山公园为例[J]. 城市问题,2019(3):44-50.
[5] 刘宇舒,王振宇,单卓然.苏州乡村水域空间生态系统文化服务评价及其优化策略研究[J]. 景观设计学(中英文),2021,9(2):38-49.
[6] 王云才,李烨,盛硕.基于诗词文本的历史文化景观服务评估与分区管控:以富春江历史性河流廊道为例[J]. 风景园林,2022,29(10):12-19.
[7] THIELE J,ALBERT C,HERMES J,et al.Assessing and quantifying offered cultural ecosystem services of German river landscapes[J]. Ecosystem Services,2020,42:101080.
[8] 杨丽雯,王大勇,李双成.生态系统文化服务供需关系量化方法研究:以平陆大天鹅景区为例[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版),2021,57(4):691-698.
[9] CROUZAT E,DE FRUTOS A,GRESCHO V,et al.Potential supply and actual use of cultural ecosystem services in mountain protected areas and their surroundings[J]. Ecosystem Services,2022,53:101395.
[10] WANG Y N,SHI X X,CHENG K J,et al.How do urban park features affect cultural ecosystem services:quantified evidence for design practices[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2022,76:127713.
[11] 李永钧,张单阳,王珂,等.乡村生态系统文化服务供需关系研究:以浙江省湖州市为例[J]. 生态学报,2022,42(17):6888-6899.
[12] 刘滨谊,左佑,张琳.江南水网乡村地方性景观生态系统自然-文化服务耦合协调研究:以长三角生态绿色一体化发展示范区为例[J]. 中国城市林业,2023,21(5):9-18.
[13] 蒙小英,侯松晔.京秦铁路北京中心城区段沿线开放空间生态系统服务功能研究[J]. 园林,2022,39(3):69-77.
[14] 肖华斌,安淇,况苑霖,等.健康福祉视角下城市绿地文化服务供需测度与空间表征:基于地块尺度的济南市旧城分区实证研究[J]. 西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2022,54(3):376-385.
[15] 刘颂,杨莹,颜文涛.基于生态系统文化服务供需平衡的公园绿地配置研究框架[J]. 中国城市林业,2021,19(3):14-18.
[16] 蒙小英,边紫琳,陈远方.京广铁路北京中心城区段廊道绿地生态系统文化服务供应潜力与机会[J]. 风景园林,2022,29(10):38-44.
[17] 王明华,欧然.无线传感网络可信信息覆盖泰森多边形区域划分算法研究[J]. 南华大学学报(自然科学版),2019,33(5):46-53.
[18] PEÑA L,CASADO-ARZUAGA I,ONAINDIA M.Mapping recreation supply and demand using an ecological and a social evaluation approach[J]. Ecosystem Services,2015,13:108-118.
[19] BING Z H,QIU Y S,HUANG H P,et al.Spatial distribution of cultural ecosystem services demand and supply in urban and suburban areas:a case study from Shanghai,China[J]. Ecological Indicators,2021,127:107720.
[20] 李华.城市生态游憩空间服务功能评价与优化对策[J]. 城市规划,2015,39(8):63-69.
[21] 陈思,刘松茯.中东铁路的兴建与线路遗产研究[J]. 建筑学报,2017(增刊1):28-31.
[22] HOWLEY P.Landscape aesthetics:assessing the general publics' preferences towards rural landscapes[J]. Ecological Economics,2011,72:161-169.
[23] POSTHUMUS H,ROUQUETTE J R,MORRIS J,et al.A framework for the assessment of ecosystem goods and services;a case study on lowland floodplains in England[J]. Ecological Economics,2010,69(7):1510-1523.
[24] MENG S T,HUANG Q X,ZHANG L,et al.Matches and mismatches between the supply of and demand for cultural ecosystem services in rapidly urbanizing watersheds:a case study in the Guanting Reservoir Basin,China[J]. Ecosystem Services,2020,45:101156.
[25] PARACCHINI M L,ZULIAN G,KOPPEROINEN L,et al.Mapping cultural ecosystem services:a framework to assess the potential for outdoor recreation across the EU[J]. Ecological Indicators,2014,45:371-385.
[26] SCHOLTE SS K,DAAMS M,FARJON H,et al.Mapping recreation as an ecosystem service:considering scale,interregional differences and the influence of physical attributes[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2018,175:149-160.
[27] FIGUEROA-ALFARO R W,TANG Z H.Evaluating the aesthetic value of cultural ecosystem services by mapping geo-tagged photographs from social media data on Panoramio and Flickr[J]. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management,2017,60(2):266-281.
[28] WEISS D J,NELSON A,GIBSON H S,et al.A global map of travel time to cities to assess inequalities in accessibility in 2015[J]. Nature,2018,553(7688):333-336.
[29] MAES J,HAUCK J,PARACCHINI M L,et al.A spatial assessment of ecosystem services in Europe:methods,case studies and policy analysis-phase 2 Synthesis report[M]. Partnership for European Environmental Research,2012.
[30] SCHÄGNER J P,BRANDER L,MAES J,et al.Mapping recreational visits and values of European National Parks by combining statistical modelling and unit value transfer[J]. Journal for Nature Conservation,2016,31:71-84.
[31] GULINCK H,WAGENDORP T.References for fragmentation analysis of the rural matrix in cultural landscapes[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2002,58(2/3/4):137-146.
[32] DANESHPOUR S A,PAJOUH H D.Cultural landscape assessment of rural districts in order to Cultural Ecosystem Services (Ces) Case Study:Sahand Rural District Landscape;Kandovan Village[J]. Journal of Social Issues & Humanities,2013,1(5):210-217.
[33] 乔婧.杭州主城区滨河绿道游憩机会谱构建与景观优化研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学,2021.
[34] 边紫琳.城区铁路廊道绿地响应生态系统文化服务功能耦合机制研究[D]. 北京:北京交通大学,2023.

PDF全文 浏览全文