编号
lyqk011647
中文标题
花境植物固碳能力及碳收支评估
作者单位
1. 天津大学建筑学院 天津 30007;
2. 天津市园林花圃 天津 300112
期刊名称
中国城市林业
年份
2024
卷号
22
期号
5
栏目名称
研究论文
中文摘要
花境在城市绿地中的应用越来越广泛,但花境的碳汇效益仍然存在争议。为评价和预测花境的碳收支效益提供科学依据,基于对植物固碳量和群落碳收支的测算,以天津市常见的50种花境植物和5个花境样地为例,构建花境群落碳收支评估模型,评估并模拟花境的碳收支情况,分析花境碳收支与碳排放活动、群落特征之间的关系。结果表明:1)一年生植物与多年生植物的年固碳量平均值近似,高固碳植物有硫华菊、柳枝稷、月季等15种;2)由于运输碳排放较高等原因,大部分实际营造的花境仍是碳源;3)花境的碳汇效益受植物固碳能力、植物生活型比例、花境面积、运输距离、更新频率等多重因素影响。3)合理配置的花境能够在3~5年内实现碳平衡。最后针对研究存在的不足提出展望,即还需更多样本来验证结论,花境的长期碳收支预测应考虑更多的影响因素,以及生态效益评估应与经济效益、美学价值相结合。
英文标题
Assessments of Carbon Sequestration Capacity and Carbon Budget of Flower Borders
作者英文名
Wang Yiyi, Zhang Qinying, Zhang Yong, Dong Chao
单位英文名
1. School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China;
2. Tianjin Flower & Gardening Nursery, Tianjin 300112, China
英文摘要
Flower border has been increasingly applied, but currently people have few scientific understandings of their carbon sequestration capacity. Based on the calculation of vegetation's carbon sequestration and plant community's carbon budget, this paper constructs a simple model to evaluate flower border carbon budget using 50 plants commonly used in flower borders and 5 flower borders in Tianjin, and analyzes the relationship between carbon budget of flower borders and carbon emission activities as well as community characteristics. It aims to provide the science base for evaluate and forecast the benefits brought in by the carbon budget of flower border. The results indicate: 1) Annual and perennial plants have similar average carbon sink, while there are significant differences in carbon sequestration capacity between plants of the same life form. And there are 15 species of high carbon-storage plants, such as Cosmos sulphureus, Panicum virgatum and Rosa chinensis; 2) Due to high carbon emissions of transportation, small areas of flower border, and unreasonable living facilities configuration, the majority of flower borders created are still carbon sources; and 3) To achieve a carbon-balanced flower border within 3-5 years, the following conditions should be usually met: the area exceeds 150 square meters, the distance to transportation area is within 82 kilometers, the renewal model is adopted that the annual plants are replaced by perennial herbaceous plants and shrubs, the proportion of annual herbaceous plants is less than or equal to 50% in area, the proportion of perennial herbaceous plants is less than or equal to 60% or greater than 80% in area, and the area of shrubs is not limited.
英文关键词
low carbon;plant;flower border;carbon budget
起始页码
157
截止页码
167
投稿时间
2023/3/27
作者简介
王一祎(1998-),女,硕士,研究方向为园林植物景观应用,E-mail:13133590720@163.com
通讯作者介绍
张秦英(1977-),女,博士,风景园林系副主任、副教授、博士生导师,研究方向为园林植物资源与景观应用。E-mail:qinying_zhang@163.com
E-mail
qinying_zhang@163.com
DOI
10.12169/zgcsly.2023.03.27.0002
参考文献
[1] 王美仙, 刘燕.花境及其在国外的研究应用[J]. 北方园艺, 2006(4):135-136.
[2] 王一祎, 张秦英, 李炅.基于CiteSpace的国内花境研究综述[J]. 园林, 2023, 40(2):109-115.
[3] 冀媛媛, 罗杰威, 王婷, 等.基于低碳理念的景观全生命周期碳源和碳汇量化探究:以天津仕林苑居住区为例[J]. 中国园林, 2020, 36(8):68-72.
[4] TANG F Y.Carbon footprint research of landscape engineering based on life cycle analysis—take the unoccupied space landscape engineering of Wuhan optics valley road (optics valley road one—Liufang road section) for example[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014, 584/585/586:695-704.
[5] PARK H M, JO H K.Ecological design and construction strategies through life cycle assessment of carbon budget for urban parks in Korea[J]. Forests, 2021, 12(10):1399.
[6] KUITTINEN M, MOINEL C, ADALGEIRSDOTTIR K.Carbon sequestration through urban ecosystem services A case study from Finland[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 563:623-632.
[7] 宋亮平, 楚新正, 杨晶.艾比湖湿地边缘带典型植物固碳能力研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2016, 39(1):136-143.
[8] CHAROENKIT S, YIEMWATTANA S.Role of specific plant characteristics on thermal and carbon sequestration properties of living walls in tropical climate[J]. Building and Environment, 2017, 115:67-79.
[9] SEYEDABADI M R, KARRABI M, NABATI J.Investigating green roofs' CO2 sequestration with cold-and drought-tolerant plants (a short- and long-term carbon footprint view)[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2022, 29(10):14121-14130.
[10] 陈高路, 陈林, 庞丹波, 等.贺兰山10种典型植物固碳释氧能力研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(3):206-213, 220.
[11] 郝鑫杰, 李素英, 王继伟, 等.呼和浩特市13种绿化植物固碳释氧效率的比较研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2017, 37(6):1196-1204.
[12] 陈月华, 廖建华, 覃事妮.长沙地区19种园林植物光合特性及固碳释氧测定[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2012, 32(10):116-120.
[13] 李辉, 赵卫智.北京5种草坪地被植物生态效益的研究[J]. 中国园林, 1998(04):34-36.
[14] 韩焕金.哈尔滨市主要植物生理生态功能研究[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2005, 32(4):5-10.
[15] 谭庆, 童俊, 戢小梅, 等.武汉31种野生地被植物的固碳释氧和降温增湿研究[J]. 中国园林, 2010, 26(8):93-95.
[16] 赵艳玲, 阚丽艳, 车生泉.上海社区常见园林植物固碳释氧效应及优化配置对策[J]. 上海交通大学学报(农业科学版), 2014, 32(4):45-53.
[17] 汤红丽.高校校园绿地植物碳收支量化及优化研究:以天津大学校园绿地为例[D]. 天津:天津大学, 2021.
[18] 萧箫, 陈彤, 郑中华, 等.上海公园绿化养护碳排放量计算研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报(农业科学版), 2013, 31(1):67-71.
[19] 刘洪涛, 陈同斌, 郑国砥, 等.有机肥与化肥的生产能耗、投入成本和环境效益比较分析:以污泥堆肥生产有机肥为例[J]. 生态环境学报, 2010, 19(4):1000-1003.
[20] 徐玮玮, 李晓储, 汪成忠, 等.扬州古运河风光带绿地树种固碳释氧效应初步研究[J]. 浙江林学院学报, 2007, 24(5):575-580.
[21] WANG Y N, CHANG Q, LI X Y.Promoting sustainable carbon sequestration of plants in urban greenspace by planting design:a case study in parks of Beijing[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2021, 64:127291.
[22] 褚芷萱, 马锦义, 邵海燕, 等.不同应用类型园林树木固碳能力[J]. 中国城市林业, 2022, 20(1):126-129.
PDF全文
浏览全文