关键词 生态安全格局  农业文化遗产  整体性?；ば薷?ensp; 生态环境区划与管理  可持续发展 

基金项目 国家自然科学基金项目(42101269),云南省基础研究计划项目(202201AU070145、202501AT070379),科技部重点研发计划项目(2020YFD1100705)作者简介:廖常左(1996-),女,硕士生,研究方向为国土空间生态?；ば薷垂婊?。E-mail:2286169279@qq.com

英文标题 Identification of Ecological Protection and Restoration Patterns in Agricultural Heritage Sites Based on the Concept of Life Community

作者英文名 Liao Changzuo, Li Ruida, Wu Yanling

单位英文名 School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China

英文摘要 【Objective】 To construct an ecological security pattern for the world heritage site of Hani in Yuanyang County, and provide a basis for delicacy management of natural resources in agriculture culture heritage site. 【Method】 Taking the agricultural heritage site located in Yuanyang County as the study area, this research integrates ecosystem service importance, ecological sensitivity, and landscape connectivity to identify ecological source areas based on the concept of life community. An ecological resistance surface is constructed based on the reciprocal of habitat quality, and circuit theory is applied to delineate ecological corridors and their critical nodes, thereby establishing the ecological security pattern for the region and proposing corresponding ecological improvement measures. 【Result】 1) There are 180 ecological sources in Yuanyang, covering 552.8 km² (24.98% of the total area), and they are predominantly distributed in state-owned forest farms of southern and western regions, representing ecosystem service hotspots and sensitive areas; and 2) A total of 323 ecological corridors (totally 717.93 km long) are identified, which ensure the connectivity between ecological sources. There are 91 ecological pinch points (5.49 km²) located between ecological corridors as priority conservation areas, and 100 ecological barrier points (3.45 km²) at the peripheries of ecological corridors or the edge of ecological sources. Accordingly, multi-level restoration zones are delineated. 【Conclusion】 An integrated conservation-restoration framework is established featuring an integration of one ecological belt, two development axes, six functional zones, and multiple core areas with green mountains, lucid waters, forests and farmlands as foundation. This provides an applicable technological framework of systematic identification-spatial optimization-pattern delineation for agriculture culture heritage preservation, which is helpful for the coordinated development of ecological conservation, culture heritage and economic vigor.

英文关键词 ecological security pattern;agricultural heritage;integrated preservation and restoration;zoning and management of ecological environment;sustainable development

起始页码 107

截止页码 114

投稿时间 2025/3/24

作者简介 廖常左(1996-),女,硕士生,研究方向为国土空间生态保护修复规划。E-mail:2286169279@qq.com

通讯作者介绍 李睿达(1988-),女,博士,副教授,研究方向为国土空间生态?；ば薷垂婊?、人类福祉。E-mail:20200099@kust.edu.cn

E-mail 20200099@kust.edu.cn

DOI 10.12169/zgcsly.2025.03.24.0001

参考文献 [1] ZHAN G,JIN Z.Hani rice terraces of Honghe-the harmonious landscape of nature and humans[J].Landscape Research,2015,40(6):655-667.
[2] 毛志睿,车兴蕊,陈笑葵,等.元阳哈尼梯田遗产核心区景观格局时空演变特征[J].中国城市林业,2025,23(1):119-126.
[3] WANG N,LI J H,ZHOU Z X.Landscape pattern optimization approach to protect rice terrace Agroecosystem:case of GIAHS siteJiache Valley,Guizhou,southwest China[J].Ecological Indicators,2021,129:107958.
[4] 杨李玲,和阳一丹,唐红,等.云南红河流域土地利用变化的地形梯度效应及其功能分区[J].云南大学学报(自然科学版),2024,46(2):276-287.
[5] 彭建,吕丹娜,张甜,等.山水林田湖草生态?；ば薷吹南低承匀现猍J].生态学报,2019,39(23):8755-8762.
[6] 王夏晖,何军,饶胜,等.山水林田湖草生态保护修复思路与实践[J].环境?；?2018,46(增刊1):17-20.
[7] 杨宇亮,罗丹,角媛梅.元江南岸稻作聚落的多尺度人居环境效应研究[J].城市规划,2021,45(8):20-30.
[8] 周小凤,张朝枝.元阳哈尼梯田遗产化与旅游化的关系演变与互动机制[J].人文地理,2019,34(3):154-160.
[9] 张兆年,角媛梅,杨帅琦.中国南方五大水稻梯田时空变化特征及其驱动机制[J].农业工程学报,2025,41(1):288-297.
[10] PENG J,YANG Y,LIU Y X,et al.Linking ecosystem services and circuit theory to identify ecological securitypatterns[J].Science of The Total Environment,2018,644:781-790.
[11] 王蓓,岳邦瑞,南昊,等.生态安全视角下山地-平原型城市土地利用冲突区分级识别[J].中国城市林业,2024,22(5):130-137,149.
[12] 孔凡斌,段淑慧,徐彩瑶.基于生态系统服务和生态敏感性的生态安全格局构建:以钱塘江流域为例[J].生态学报,2024,44(24):11359-11374.
[13] 李芹,王宇,张华,等.云南高原脆弱生态地质环境类型与特征及生态修复对策[J].中国岩溶,2024,43(6):1261-1274.
[14] 高梦雯,胡业翠,李向,等.基于生态系统服务重要性和环境敏感性的喀斯特山区生态安全格局构建:以广西河池为例[J].生态学报,2021,41(7):2596-2608.
[15] 王婷,任云英.城市新区绿色基础设施网络优化:基于景观格局和形态空间格局分析[J].中国城市林业,2023,21(2):105-114.
[16] SOILLE P,VOGT P.Morphological segmentation of binarypatterns[J].Pattern Recognition Letters,2009,30(4):456-459.
[17] 刘瑞雪,林小龙,李云.基于MSPA-生境质量评估和电路理论的城市绿色基础设施网络优化研究:以深圳市为例[J].中国园林,2024,40(10):68-74.
[18] FиUKALOVÁ E,ZŸKA V,ROMPORTL D.The network of green infrastructure based on ecosystem services supply in central Europe[J].Land,2021,10(6):592.
[19] 王鹏,况福民,邓育武,等.基于主成分分析的衡阳市土地生态安全评价[J].经济地理,2015,35(1):168-172.
[20] 薛强,路路,牛韧,等.基于地质灾害敏感性的生态安全格局关键区识别与修复:以济南市为例[J].生态学报,2021,41(22):9050-9063.
[21] 丁金华,褚涵,孙琦.基于MSPA与电路理论的水网地区生态网络构建[J].中国城市林业,2024,22(5):122-129.
[22] 刘帅,朱杰勇,杨得虎,等.基于斜坡单元与随机森林模型的元阳县崩滑地质灾害易发性评价[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2023,34(4):144-150.
[23] GAO M W,HU Y C,BAI Y P.Construction of ecological security pattern in national land space from the perspective of the community of life in mountain,water,forest,field,lake and grass:a case study in Guangxi Hechi,China[J].Ecological Indicators,2022,139:108867.
[24] 崔桂鹏,党宏忠,熊伟,等.对三北工程区退化林修复策略的思考[J].林业科学,2025,61(1):10-16.
[25] 王腾雯,程俊豪,熊航,等.融合生态安全格局和基于自然解决方案的山水林田坝草一体化保护和系统治理[J].生态学报,2025,45(3):1210-1225.
[26] CUI X F,DENG W,YANG J X,et al.Construction and optimization of ecological security patterns based on social equity perspective:a case study in Wuhan,China[J].Ecological Indicators,2022,136:108714.
[27] GUO X,MIN Q W,JIAO W J.Spatial distribution characteristics and differentiated management strategies of China Nationally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences,2024,34(3):483-498.

PDF全文 浏览全文